[ English | 한국어 (대한민국) | English (United Kingdom) | Indonesia | Deutsch ]
OpenStack-Helm 1.0 Requirements¶
OpenStack-Helm has undergone rapid development and maturation over its lifetime, and is nearing the point of real-world readiness. This spec details the functionality that must be implemented in OpenStack-Helm for it to be considered ready for a 1.0 release, as well as for general use.
This spec describes a point-in-time readiness for OpenStack-Helm 1.0, after which it will be for historical reference only.
The proposed requirements for a 1.0 release are as follows:
A foundational requirement of 1.0 readiness is the presence of robust gating that will ensure functionality, backward compatibility, and upgradeability. This will allow development to continue and for support for new versions of OpenStack to be added post-1.0. The following gating requirements must be met:
Helm test for all charts
Helm test is the building block for all gating. Each chart must integrate a helm-test script which validates proper functionality. This is already a merge criterion for new charts, but a handful of older charts still need for helm test functionality to be added. No additional charts will be merged prior to 1.0 unless they meet this requirement (and others in this document).
Resiliency across reboots
All services should survive node reboots, and their functionality validated following a reboot by a gate.
Gating must prove that upgrades from each supported OpenStack version to the next operate flawlessly, using the default image set (LOCI). Specifically, each OpenStack chart should be upgraded from one release to the next, and each infrastructure service from one minor version to the next. Both the container image and configuration must be modified as part of this upgrade. At minimum, Newton to Ocata upgrade must be validated for the 1.0 release.
Code Completion and Refactoring¶
A number of in-progress and planned development efforts must be completed prior to 1.0, to ensure a stable OpenStack-Helm interface thereafter.
Charts in the appropriate project
All charts should migrate to their appropriate home project as follows:
OpenStack-Helm for OpenStack services
OpenStack-Helm-Infra for supporting services
OpenStack-Helm-Addons for ancillary services
In particular, these charts must move to OpenStack-Helm-Infra:
Currently both OpenStack-Helm and OpenStack-Helm-Infra have their own parallel versions of the Helm-Toolkit library chart. They must be combined into a single chart in OpenStack-Helm-Infra prior to 1.0.
Standardization of manifests
Work is underway to refactor common manifest patterns into reusable snippets in Helm-Toolkit. The following manifests have yet to be combined:
Database drop Job
Standardization of values
OpenStack-Helm has developed a number of conventions around the format and ordering of charts’ values.yaml file, in support of both reusable Helm-Toolkit functions and ease of developer ramp-up. For 1.0 readiness, OpenStack-Helm must cement these conventions within a spec, as well as the ordering of values.yaml keys. These conventions must then be gated to guarantee conformity. The spec in progress can be found here 1.
Inclusion of all core services
Charts for all core OpenStack services must be present to achieve 1.0 releasability. The only core service outstanding at this time is Swift.
Split Ceph chart
The monolithic Ceph chart does not allow for following Ceph upgrade best practices, namely to upgrade Mons, OSDs, and client services in that order. The Ceph chart must therefore be split into at least three charts (one for each of the above upgrade phases) prior to 1.0 to ensure smooth in-place upgradability.
Values-driven config files
In order to maximize flexibility for operators, and to help facilitate upgrades to newer versions of containerized software without editing the chart itself, all configuration files will be specified dynamically based on values.yaml and overrides. In most cases the config files will be generated based on the YAML values tree itself, and in some cases the config file content will be specified in values.yaml as a string literal.
Comprehensive documentation is key to the ability for real-world operators to benefit from OpenStack-Helm, and so it is a requirement for 1.0 releasability. The following outstanding items must be completed from a documentation perspective:
Document version requirements
Version requirements for the following must be documented and maintained:
External charts (Calico)
Document Kubernetes requirements
OpenStack-Helm supports a “bring your own Kubernetes” paradigm. Any particular k8s configuration or feature requirements must be documented.
Hosts must use KubeDNS / CoreDNS for resolution
Kubernetes must enable mount propagation (until it is enabled by default)
Helm must be installed
Examples of how to set up the above under KubeADM and KubeSpray-based clusters must be documented as well.
OpenStack-Helm release process
The OpenStack-Helm release process will be somewhat orthogonal to the OpenStack release process, and the differences and relationship between the two must be documented in a spec. This will help folks quickly understand why OpenStack-Helm is a Release-Independent project from an OpenStack perspective.
Release notes for the 1.0 release must be prepared, following OpenStack best practices. The criteria for future changes that should be included in release notes in an ongoing fashion must be defined / documented as well.
Any other changes to the external interface of OpenStack-Helm
LMA Operations Guide
A basic Logging, Monitoring, and Alerting-oriented operations guide must be in place, illustrating for operators (and developers) how to set up and use an example LMA setup for OpenStack and supporting services. It will include instructions on how to perform basic configuration and how to access and use the user interfaces at a high level. It will also link out to more detailed documentation for the LMA tooling itself.
Process and Tooling¶
To facilitate effective collaboration and communication across the OpenStack-Helm community team, work items for the enhancements above will be captured in Storyboard. Therefore, migration from Launchpad to Storyboard must be accomplished prior to the 1.0 release. Going forward, Storyboard will be leveraged as a tool to collaboratively define and communicate the OpenStack-Helm roadmap.
This spec lays out the criteria for a stable and reliable 1.0 release, which can serve as the basis for real-world use as well as ongoing development. The alternative approaches would be to either iterate indefinitely without defining a 1.0 release, which would fail to signal to operators the point at which the platform is ready for real-world use; or, to define a 1.0 release which fails to satisfy key features which real-world operators need.
This spec describes a wide variety of self-contained work efforts, which will be implemented individually by the whole OpenStack-Helm team.
mattmceuen (Matt McEuen <email@example.com>) for coordination
powerds (DaeSeong Kim <firstname.lastname@example.org>) for the values.yaml ordering spec 1
portdirect (Pete Birley <email@example.com>) for the release management spec 2
randeep.jalli (Randeep Jalli <firstname.lastname@example.org>) and renmak (Renis Makadia <email@example.com>) for splitting up the Ceph chart
rwellum (Rich Wellum <firstname.lastname@example.org>) for coordination of Storyboard adoption
Additional assignees TBD
See above for the list of work items.
See above for gating requirements.
See above for documentation requirements.
TODO - release management spec