OSSN-0065: Users of Glance may be able to replace active image data¶
Summary¶
When Glance has been configured with the show_multiple_locations option enabled with default policy for set and delete locations, it is possible for a non-admin user having write access to the image metadata to replace active image data.
Affected Services / Software¶
Glance (Havana, Icehouse, Juno, Kilo, Liberty, Mitaka, Newton, Ocata)
Discussion¶
As a convenience to operators, Glance has a multiple location feature, disabled by default, that allows a single image to be stored in multiple places. This is intended to offer an extra degree of resilience by improving the availability of Glance images. This feature involves a user setting a new entry in an image’s ‘locations’ list, not visible to users by default, via the Glance API. However, this process does not involve taking a checksum of the data in a newly created image location, and hence does not involve comparing the checksum field of the image (which is always visible to users) with the checksum of any added locations. This design opens the possibility that a malicious user could create an image in Glance, set an additional location on that image pointing to an altered image, then delete the original location, so that consumers of the original image would unwittingly be using the malicious image. Note, however, that this attack vector cannot change the original image’s checksum, and it is limited to images that are owned by the attacker.
Recommended Actions¶
The reach of this attack depends upon how broadly usage of the original image is spread among consumers who do not checksum images before they are used. Glance enables three ways for an image to be made available to other users:
Making an image “public”. This makes an image available to all users of a cloud. The ability to do this is governed by the
publicize_imagepolicy, which is restricted to the admin role by default since the Juno release.Making an image “community”. This feature is only available since Ocata. This makes an image available to all users of a cloud, but unlike a “public” image, it does not appear in the default image-list response of any user (other than the owner). It is governed by the
communitize_imagepolicy, which is unrestricted by default.Making an image “shared”. Glance allows project-to-project image sharing, in which a user in project A shares an image with project B by making project B a member of the image. The ability to do this is governed by the
add_memberpolicy, which is unrestricted by default.
Project-to-project sharing is the default, based on the
owner_is_tenant configuration setting in Glance. In a cloud configured
so that owner_is_tenant is false, image sharing is user-to-user. This
is a cloud-wide configuration, users may not determine whether sharing
is project-to-project or owner-to-owner.
Note that what has been discussed so far is independent of the specific
vulnerability discussed in this notice. We encourage cloud operators to
review their current settings for the policies mentioned above. In
particular, we recommend that the publicize_image policy be restricted
to admins (as it has been by default since the Juno release) so that
users can rely on the trustworthiness of a “public” image.
With respect to the image location vulnerability described above, we recommend that operators review the settings of the following configuration options and policies:
The configuration option
show_multiple_locations. If this is set to False, this attack vector is not available.The policy
set_image_location. Whenshow_multiple_locationsis set toTrue, we recommend that this policy be restricted to administrators, and if necessary, to trusted users. It is currently unrestricted by default.The policies
get_image_locationanddelete_image_location. These policies are unrestricted by default (but note that ifshow_multiple_locationsisFalse, they do not come into play).
Additionally, image consumers should be encouraged to checksum images they consume and compare the result to the ‘checksum’ field in the response from the Images API.
Finally, in addition to reviewing the specific location policy targets
mentioned above, we encourage operators to review the ‘default’ target
in their Glance policy.json file. This target is used when the software
references a policy target that is not specifically defined in the
policy.json file, as may happen when new targets are introduced in the
software but the policy file being used is from a prior release. Since
Newton, Glance has shipped with "default":"role:admin", but prior to
that, Glance shipped with "default":"", which would make any target not
specifically mentioned in the file unrestricted.
Contacts / References¶
Author: Robert Clark, IBM
This OSSN : https://docs.openstack.org/security-notes/OSSN-0065.html
Original LaunchPad Bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ossn/+bug/1549483
OpenStack Security ML : openstack-security@lists.openstack.org
OpenStack Security Group : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ossg
Multiple Image Location BP : https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/multiple-image-locations